Can it be true?March 9th, 2006 @ 8:00 am
I have been trying to follow the “is she, or isn’t she?!” saga with Britney Spears these last few weeks. I don’t feel like I’ve read enough research to form my own opinion on it yet.
Yesterday’s post on “A Socialite’s Life” has pictures of Britney in a bikini. Check them out and let’s see if we can figure out this mystery. Is she pregnant, or still working on losing the baby fat from little Sean Preston?
See, it’s just like we’re Nancy Drew. Only better dressed, and little more sassy.
Gossip
Ashley
said,
March 9, 2006 at 9:52 am
I have been following this, too. What is the DEAL? She’ll be able to bounce one on each knee as she careens out of control in her SUV?
jessica
said,
March 9, 2006 at 9:54 am
I firmly believe that she’s pregnant again. I follow all the stupid celebrity gossip closely and it looks like she has developed more of a bump over the past few weeks. If she really is pregnant again, all I can say is WHY?!
Anth
said,
March 9, 2006 at 10:18 am
I didn’t think she was, but this picture is making me reconsider. (I thought she was just drawn to Cheetos like light to a black hole.) That belly doesn’t look like I-just-had-a-baby flab. Wtf. I’m starting to think K-Fed sterilization might be a public service. Or is that too mean to say out loud?
Mrs. Ca
said,
March 9, 2006 at 10:42 am
I hope, for her sake, that she isn’t. She’s been talking about a comeback and another pregnancy so soon would totally kill that (I’m a kind-of-closeted Britney fan). In US weekly they said that they think it’s just post-breastfeeding weight gain, since it burns about 500 calories a day, if she stopped without changing her diet, she could gain pretty fast. (They interviewed doctors for their opinions, so it has to be true, right?)
anna
said,
March 9, 2006 at 10:43 am
Wow, these pictures really make it look like she is pregnant. Guess it’s only a matter of months until we know for sure.
Lori
said,
March 9, 2006 at 11:00 am
She totally is. Ugh. She really must have the emotional maturity of an 11 year old. Why is she still married to (not to mention procreating with) that LOSER?!?!?
Oh, Britney. I guess you’re just acting out.
Fraulein N
said,
March 9, 2006 at 11:09 am
I think it’s fat from the baby and all the Cheetos. At least, I hope that’s what it is. Okay, hell, I have no idea; it’s just wishful thinking on my part.
AnnieM
said,
March 9, 2006 at 11:24 am
Ugh, say it isn’t so! Those poor offspring! I am just going to keep my fingers crossed that she is like the rest of us that take a little longer to lose the weight! She does look kind of “thick” everywhere, not just the pooch.
Katja
said,
March 9, 2006 at 11:57 am
I say she is pregnant. Maybe she thought nursing was a good birth control method…
Heather B.
said,
March 9, 2006 at 12:07 pm
I doubt she nurses. She probably thinks it takes up too much of her precious time.
Also? You make a WAY better looking pregnant woman than that tramp.
Hilary
said,
March 9, 2006 at 12:08 pm
ALL I have to say is that if Ratboy (K-Fed) has reproduced again, I’m going to shoot myself!
Artist Formerly Known as Ella
said,
March 9, 2006 at 12:52 pm
If she is I’m still in denial over it. Where did my pop princess go?
Sarah
said,
March 9, 2006 at 12:54 pm
I think she’s not pregnant. But now that I’ve written that I’m starting to think she is. Let’s hope it’s baby weight and that there’s not going to be another Federline in the world.
Nap Queen
said,
March 9, 2006 at 1:44 pm
Her tummy looks too perky to be baby fat. I say she absolutely is!!!
Avorie
said,
March 9, 2006 at 2:58 pm
My vote is that it’s baby fat. It doesn’t look firm enough to be pregnancy…
On the other hand, who would wear a bikini looking like that? It’s one thing if your pregnant, but quite another if you’re displaying baby fat - especially if you are famous.
Frema
said,
March 9, 2006 at 4:38 pm
She looks pregnant to me. She also looks like she’s begging for attention if she’s wearing a bikini in her condition.
Christar
said,
March 9, 2006 at 4:52 pm
Good to know I’m not the only one that is going crazy with this question! For reasons unknown, I follow all the stories on her, and I honestly believe she is. Because if you saw the the pics of her in People Magazine last month, then she obviously lost a ton of her baby fat. She has to be prego… And I think the reason her tummy looks kinda gushier than the first time, is because she still does have a bit of baby fat from her first pregnancy.
Suzanne
said,
March 9, 2006 at 7:58 pm
Ok, after seeing the people mag pictures…she is totally pg!! Wow to the pregnancy, wow to the bikini & what is that on her foot?
the ockers
said,
March 10, 2006 at 1:56 am
Yes Lori, I’m with you. I think she is up the duff and I think K-Fed is a total LOSER!
I think poor Britney is too young and stupid to realise that another baby isn’t going to save a terrible, failing marriage. especially if you’re married to the world’s biggest moocher. Including K-Fed, that’ll be 3 babies for Britnet to worry about!
Sheesh, I think she can kiss her career goodbye for the time being and that Moocher will then take her to the cleaners when she finally kicks him out for good. Why didn’t she have a pre-nup? and why doesn’t she use birth-control? some many obvious questions and terrible image in mind -Kevin Ferderlines ugly mug!
Emmakirst
said,
March 10, 2006 at 4:09 am
That’d be crazy if she were, i read somewhere she’d be due in Sept. When was the other little guy born??
Jezer
said,
March 10, 2006 at 6:05 am
Totally preggo. Here’s why I think so: I am only 2 months post-baby, and I don’t have the resources (trainer, nutritionist, etc–not that I’m so sure she’d use those), nor the youth nor the pre-baby body that Britney has/had, and my belly is way flatter than that. I’m not bragging, I’m just saying…
K-Fed is so nasty, he looks like he smells bad.
kellyf
said,
March 10, 2006 at 6:19 am
I saw a new pic over on Pink is the New Blog, I think from the New York Post, which makes her bump look even bigger.
God help us all.
napagirl
said,
March 10, 2006 at 7:33 am
I think she’s preggo. Dear Lord help us all. But maybe it’s just the Cheetos. But then again, she DID look REALLY good in People a few weeks ago. Crap….I don’t know. What I DO know is that every time I see a Burger King commercial, I think about your husband. Can’t help myself.
Lisa
said,
March 10, 2006 at 8:09 am
That bump looks pretty firm. I’m thinking she’s got another nasty Feder-spawn in there. Like the world needs another white trash, skanky man. But I hope not for her sake.
Chas
said,
March 10, 2006 at 3:31 pm
I hadn’t heard of this rumor….but it looks like she might be to me. That belly doesn’t look flabby; it looks pretty firm, like when you’re in the end of that first trimester.
Anonymous
said,
March 14, 2006 at 9:12 am
I took the time to read all 25 previous comments. Not one of them said that perhaps she will NEVER get a perfectly trim little skanky tummy again because SHE CHOSE to have her child surgically removed from her abdomen. She decided that cutting through muscle and skin in a major abdominal surgery was much less “painful” than an epidural and a vaginal birth…. Just another reason to chalk her up as an idiot married to an even bigger idiot… as the previous posts are much more adept at describing. If she is pregnant again… at least her OB will be able to make his Lexus payment at due date time. Retch!
jen
said,
March 14, 2006 at 1:58 pm
I think so, tho it has been speculated that SOME pics look photoshopped to make her look more so…(I check Pink Is the New Blog daily which basically has a running track of the situation).